Yes!! Both should arrived this coming week and so I am getting very excited! It was un-important to me; I own an M 262. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! Very nice work. Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. Here are photos from my first shoot with it: https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party. Also for helping critical focus wide open at close distance. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. Then out of curiosity, I've bough at fair price ( sh price dropped when M10 came, I couldn't resist) former digital Ms (M240, M-D, M246). This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. It seemed it was not much larger than an M7; that, alone, was enough to make me decide I would own one someday. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. Without a magnifier piececomfortable view is 50-35mm. Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. Of course there will be technological advances and all kinds of new features. https://www.overgaard.dk/Leica-M-Type-240-aka-Leica-M10-digital-rangefinder-camera-page-44-Focusing-the-Leica-M-with-Manual-Focus-EVF2-Visoflex-Electronic-Viewfinder.html. The entire camera feels built to last and like a well engineered tool in use. This has become a bit of a trend now, I buy a digital Leica, shoot with it for a while, decide to sell it for one reason or another, and then scramble to write about it in the final few days of owning it. Ha!Have you ever read my Fuji X100f review I think you might enjoy it.https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/. Thanks!These new Nikons look fairly amazing I do wish theyd been quicker to market though!M10 review I guess it depends on how much it inspires a post out of me its the first new Leica Digital camera Ive ever bought, and with it being new/current, I might try and squeeze something out sooner rather than later. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. In case youre confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. Its based on the body of the M240, but as Ive said, when it was released it was pitched as a more affordable stripped-back camera with less features. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. Anyway, Im firmly off topic at this point, but almost two years on and I have no gripes at all with the M10. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come., [] a moment to reflect on this previous style of photography of mine. great output, but cant get a shot off faster than with the M8. These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. I soon found one on eBay for a price I was happy to pay and a few days later I had a chrome-finished M240 to keep my company whilst my poorly M262 was seen to by the camera-doctors. I also dont shoot flash and I dont bracket, so really the only part of the set-menu thats of use to me is the ISO settings, and the ISO settings have their own dedicated button. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. I cant keep it my business partner has vetoed that idea. This includes the M10-R, M10-P, M10 Monochrom, M10, and M10-D from the current generation, as well as the M (Typ 240), M-P (Typ 240), M (Typ 262), M-D (Typ 262) and the M Monochrom (Typ 246) from the prior generation. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. Compared Usage Recommendations More. The combination of the live view and the advantages I had begun to feel a physical ISO dial could bring to the table were then enough to have me wondering how much of my kit Id have to sell to change up to the M10. I used the M240 for over two years before upgrading to the M10 a year and a half ago. Thanks, James. The M262 was the stripped-back camera that came after the M240 and before the M10 and as regular readers of this website will know, I do like a stripped-back camera.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Leica must have listened to some of their users who felt that they didnt need a lot of the features that the Leica M240 offered them, and created a camera that felt a little more like a natural progression from the M9. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. Display as a link instead, Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. However, the megapixel count is not the only important element determining the quality of an image. Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. I know youre right, I often talk about the bullshit involved in the upgrade path but it has an iso dial! It depends on your needs. The sensor is not the same, by the way. Leica M262 - "A Leica M240 in a Leica M9 body" The Leica M 262 that Leica Camera AG surprisingly introduced November 2015 is basically a Leica M 240 in a Leica M9 body. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. Never came to me idea to compare them side by side, sorry. Can you compare side by side, please? Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. Image quality is exceptionally good across the native ISO range, the weight has been decreased substantially, and . At which point I bought a stand-in M240 and I discovered the joys of live view on an m-mount Leica. I have used many rangefinders, a Leica M8, M9 (and its variants M-E/M9P/MM), M262, M240P and of course most recently the M-D 262. I missed his musings in AP. So I am very glad I got the 240 version. I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. That alone justifies the decision to buy. My justification for upgrading from the M9 to the Leica M262 was almost more ridiculous than the justifications Im hanging my decisions off moving from M262 to M10. I guess its only really there as it was the most logical thing for Leica to put there in place of the LV live view button on the M240. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Nice write-up. It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. How important do you think live view will be for you? It unites decades of experience in rangefinder technology with groundbreaking digital technologies: It features a completely newly developed high-resolution full-format CMOS sensor that, in combination with its high-performance processor and the legendary M-Lenses; delivers outstanding . (Leica M (Typ 262)), Unknown. . If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. Best wishes to you all and thanks again for your help. To set it, you simply half press the shutter then jog the thumb dial. Something about the idea that it had all these weird and wonderful features made me expect a camera that felt different. !if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_13',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); One way or another, in the time Ive been using the camera, Ive not got used to this little issue, though I have at least learned to live with it. . As mentioned, one of the big selling points Leica hung their marketing angle off when launching the Leica M262 was the reduction of menu options to 2 screens compared to the M240. In practice, this has translated into me being able to shoot it for a lot longer without having to think about changing or charging the battery. I like to put my camera to my eye this live-view lark just doesnt appeal to me was the sort of sentence I likely uttered. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. Focusing that close without rangefinder coupling is of course quite difficult unless you have live-view. One of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. As @Jeff Skindly pointed out (when I asked about the M262), this might be a better place to seek views and opinions on this model. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. I have found that the shadows in the M10 can be pulled forever, which is great, because both cameras have about the same capacity to blow highlight details. A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? If not, moderators please delete this post. The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. Ive read all too often from M10 owners how much they miss an M9 or M8 variant because of the simplicity and CCD image quality. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. The M9 and CCD sensor. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. I use 3rd generation Sony A7 cameras with a cage and a big hand grip with a mic and an Atomos Ninja V external screen bolted to it. Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. Quality over quantity. Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. The image on viewfinder of that camera is very warm yet when the images are loaded onto the computer they are less so. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. Using the right SD card is key here. It happened with the M8,M9, more recently the M240 and now the M262. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. Leaving aside the video recording, the main difference is the simplified menu of the 262 v the live view of the 240. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). Since receiving a closer focusing lens though Ive noticed that actually the M10 rangefinder goes down to about 0.58m and the M262 goes to about 0.65m. My M8 is still around for those who are wondering. Mostly because I wanted to shoot below 0.7m and Id have to use Live View for that. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. The Leica M (Typ 262) has a pared-down feature set, an extra quiet shutter unit and a lower price than the M Typ 240. Thats why the M-D 262 and the M 262 have the same type name. I then had a feeling that Im sure a lot of people who have too many cameras have once in a while You might know it yourself? Some cards are woefully slow. The camera becomes entirely unresponsive. Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. Material choices as well as the overall fit and finish are second to none. After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! And if you are not interested in movies or EVF, as a.Noctilux said, you can ignore them. My GAS was satisfied with a Z6 with the M-to-Z adapter. Posted December 28, 2020 (edited) A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. I just picked up a Leica M-P Typ 240 to compliment my new M9-P I bought a couple weeks ago. Help us by suggesting a value. Our camera evaluations and conclusions are based . I did find a custom LR preset that helps a lot, but it would be nice to have natural skin tones straight from the camera. That said, I do miss the live view feature. Clear editor. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. It is the first position on the menu, and setting WB on a grey card or to a preset is a matter of 3 or 4 clicks.Colors. One video compares the sound of the shutter to the the M-E. Jump to content . Sometimes, colours from M262 can be a bit more saturated than from M240, but as I use them only in recording DNG, post work can do what I want. Yura, I still use both with other M along. Leica M9 vs. M240; M240: More Thoughts; Leica M240: Final Verdict; Leica M9 sharpness vs. Sony RX1R, Nikon D800E, Fuji X100s; My camera of the year for 2013; Related. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. If you want video and live view, get the 240. If zinc is your preference the M6 is your baby. Display as a link instead, As I said at the end of that post, I then found myself in with a big chuck of the dreaded GAS. The big round dial on the back of the M9 was always tricky to use. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. I will stick with my film Leica for now. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. I am very pleased to be in a forum withso many helpful people. I cant tell you how relieved I was about this I know that probably sounds daft, but my Leica rangefinders are default cameras that I rely on when I want to shoot without any thought to the camera. I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. They've been even used in a documentary made by a friend of mine. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. The obvious take-away from the third image set is just how poorly the Leica M246 and Leica M Monochrom renders overexposed highlights. You cannot paste images directly. Its still inaccurate, but at least the photos look pleasant enough. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. And the EVF is a very helpful feature sometime. In case you're confused, the M240 was the camera that followed the Leica M9. Agreed that the 262 is like some forgotten model.Also agreed on the fact that once the camera is set-up, theres no need for the buttons and menus. Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? Using the zoom focus button on the front of the camera along with Live View is a good aid to focus in these situations.Ergonomics. Ive spent the last month or so shooting with a Leica M [typ 240]. Edward - you are right about the blues and reds. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. But, as someone who shoots, buys and sells a lot of different lenses, the bigger screen would definitely offer me an advantage Id be able to take photos and check lenses were calibrated properly etc. No one ever uses video functionality of the240 anyways. Leica M Typ 240. To me this feels ever so slightly clunky as its also continued to catch me out over the time Ive used the camera. Mostly because of the need for a screen that I allude to. The Leica M262 feels to me like almost everything anyone could or should expect from a digital Leica rangefinder. I think, at least, Ive not tried one either . Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. With the ISO being menu driven, its also very possible to accidentally leave it on a too-high setting. That, in my opinion, is the Leica M 240's motto. Press and hold, select ISO, and release to lock in the setting. The M10 is akin in size to an M6TTL and this is a benefit. What is the highest ISO you are comfortable with the 240/262?I find the focus peaking on my M10 better than the Sonys Ive used. ins.style.display='block';ins.style.minWidth=container.attributes.ezaw.value+'px';ins.style.width='100%';ins.style.height=container.attributes.ezah.value+'px';container.appendChild(ins);(adsbygoogle=window.adsbygoogle||[]).push({});window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'stat_source_id',44);window.ezoSTPixelAdd(slotId,'adsensetype',1);var lo=new MutationObserver(window.ezaslEvent);lo.observe(document.getElementById(slotId+'-asloaded'),{attributes:true}); The fact is, I really like them as cameras, but largely speaking they just function for me. Cheers! Help us by suggesting a value. Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. Paste as plain text instead, Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. The battery can be recharged and used over again. I wanted an M262 for all the reasons above but found an M-P 240 for a really good price and just turned off all the video and live view. Unfortunately, this isnt something thats fixed by the M10 either though I am definitely looking forward to how much the M10 improves manual ISO control for me. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. In short, getting two cameras- a classic and a modern type, solves the damnable inadequacy issue that arises in all of us when you own just one type. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. As such, it felt like itd be the perfect camera for me. To each his own, indeed!Ive never seen one in real life mad to think Ive ordered a camera of that value without handling it. A blessing in some ways, though frustratingly its taken the edge off a feature Ive enjoyed more than I expected to. When using the M10 in aperture priority mode I dial the EV down to -0.7. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! It depends on your needs. (they really have me suckered in dont they?!). Having run the gamut of all the Ms, Ive settled on these two as my main M system and I suggest to others who cant shake the M bug to do something similar. Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? Thank you @Jeff Sfor this and also your sage comments re not having to use video and not having to use LV on the M240. To a degree, I can see their point too. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to . Leica has used the button space on the rear of the camera that is used for live view in the Typ 240 to add direct access to the white balance feature. I cant even work out how to hold the Leica M240 for video, and whilst it has focus peaking, it certainly doesnt have the features the Atomos brings to the table. I bought it as temporary replacement camera after my M262 had to pay a little trip to Germany for some repair work. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. M9 is magic, even SOOC jpgs. The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. Bringing up the live-view display gave me what appeared to my taste to be a quite unpleasant representation of the world in front of the camera. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. I have an M246 where just holding down the ISO button, turning the thumbwheel to change it then releasing does the job. Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! And I like the grainy renderings for some scenes.Live View. In the setup menu, the most used setting is white balance. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. Finally, a digital camera that truly feels like a good old analog Leica. A M262 is a friendly camera. There is no way to see the chosen ISO until the shot is taken and checking it in the image preview dialogue. The menu is cut and dry. Your previous content has been restored. Having said that, I think the M262 could be a perfect digital rangefinder camera for those looking for a minimal film-camera like digital Leica experience and not needing live view or other features. That breaks the rules by my measure, unfortunately . I am aware many own the Monochrom and love it to death. I am looking to get into the Leica M systemhave been on various of the Leica Fora, discussing the merits of an M9 / M9P. I pressed the shutter button to take a photo and was fairly disappointed to see that the image the live-view screen had showed me was now captured as a photo. I did the same thing Hamish, never having handled the M10. Ive had it for a month now. On same first menus screen can have File Format to pick DNG or DNG+JPG or JPG only.When you get the M10 Ill be interested to hear how you like the B&W jpg vs. your Monochrome. For my abilities and needs, I have a decent collection of film cameras (too many some might say) and an M8 which is surprisingly still better than just good and more than good enough for what I tend to photograph.But I admit to seriously considering the new Q2, That Q2 has excited a lot of people, it seems!Re. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. Of course it didnt. My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. I find it very quick. In a world where newer camera models are expected to have more features not less, the Leica M262 doesnt really fit into the normal upgrade path camera manufacturers offer. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. More humble pie for me! The better screen, slightly improved interface and even fairly small things like the artificially lit frame lines introduced in the M240 made the the camera feel more mature. I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262?

How To Ask To Leave Work Early Sick Email, 16 Signs You Are Unattractive Female, April Simpson Net Worth, Homes For Rent Mackintosh On The Lake Burlington, Nc, Andover Waste Recycling Centre Booking, Articles L